View Full Version : Brock Lesnar signs with WWE?
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 06:40 PM
- If the deal goes through with Brock Lesnar and WWE, the one going around Miami about a one-year deal, then expect Lesnar to be involved in a WrestleMania 29 announcement on Monday's RAW.
Credit to pwpix.net
Holy shit this is fuckin huge.
The Viper
03-31-2012, 06:47 PM
Yeah but he's a guy who left when he was at the top, so I don't care.
>_____>
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 07:05 PM
Yeah but he's a guy who left when he was at the top, so I don't care.
>_____>
Whatever it is what it is. I'm gonna try to be excited because after all it is Brock Lesnar.
Death Dealer
03-31-2012, 07:05 PM
Yeah fuck those guys who leave and come back for huge matches.
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 07:14 PM
I bet he comes out tomorrow night and F5's Rock right before he's about to pin Cena.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 07:30 PM
I really hope it's not Brock Lesnar vs The Rock. I hope he faces The Undertaker or Randy Orton.
The Viper
03-31-2012, 07:44 PM
BTW, I really, really hope this isn't an early April Fools Joke.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 07:51 PM
Former WWE/UFC star Brock Lesnar has arrived in Miami, according to the Wrestling Observer, fueling rumors that he will return to WWE at WrestleMania 28 on Sunday. Lesnar has not been heard from in three months dating back to December 30 when he lost his UFC comeback fight, then announced his retirement from MMA fighting.
Credit to pwtorch.com
Well it looks like it's gonna happen. Here Comes The Pain!
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 08:01 PM
I really hope it's not Brock Lesnar vs The Rock. I hope he faces The Undertaker or Randy Orton.
Brock/Undertaker? Erm, no thanks, and as for Orton, what's the reason behind that match?
The Viper
03-31-2012, 08:04 PM
Brock/Undertaker? Erm, no thanks, and as for Orton, what's the reason behind that match?
Brock took all of Orton's baby oil and he wants revenge. Guaranteed.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 08:04 PM
Brock/Undertaker? Erm, no thanks, and as for Orton, what's the reason behind that match?
What's the reason behind Rock vs Lesnar?
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 08:10 PM
What's the reason behind Rock vs Lesnar?
Sports vs. Entertainment in the biggest Sports Entertainment event of them all. What else do you need?
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 08:12 PM
Sports vs. Entertainment in the biggest Sports Entertainment event of them all. What else do you need?
That makes about as much sense as Brock vs Randy.
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 08:13 PM
That makes about as much sense as Brock vs Randy.
Give me a fucking break dude. Brock represents the pinnacle of achievement in SPORTS while Rock is the same thing in ENTERTAINMENT. How does Orton fit in the Rock's place there?
Might I also add that Lesnar has a win over the Rock (never returned) and took away his title of "youngest WWE Champion ever".
Thanks for coming out though.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 08:14 PM
Give me a fucking break dude. Brock represents the pinnacle of achievement in SPORTS while Rock is the same thing in ENTERTAINMENT. How does Orton fit in the Rock's place there?
Thanks for coming out though.
Two semi active wrestlers against each other. I have no desire in that. Randy vs Brock can be a much better match.
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 08:17 PM
Two semi active wrestlers against each other. I have no desire in that. Randy vs Brock can be a much better match.
:lol: are you kidding? Randy/Brock wouldn't have near the crowd heat that Rock/Brock would, nor would it be as big a seller. At the end of the day, regardless of the points I've already made towards why Rock/Brock is the better match, the simple reason is that its more financially sound from a business standpoint because its GUARANTEED buys where as Brock/Orton is not.
Also, you earlier mentioned you hoped Brock fought Undertaker. Isn't that two semi-active wrestlers against each other? Why would you have a desire to see that but not Rock/Brock?
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 08:23 PM
Rock = 7 years off
Undertaker = 1 year off
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 08:25 PM
Rock = 7 years off
Undertaker = 1 year off
Doesn't change the fact that you used the term "semi-active" wrestler which clearly covers both guys. Also, Rock has wrestled more recently than Undertaker, so if anything he's more active currently even though he was away longer.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 08:27 PM
It doesn't matter if he was more active currently. If nothing else, it's not fair that two guys who spent 7 years away from WWE gets a match against each other at 'Mania.
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 08:30 PM
It doesn't matter if he was more active currently. If nothing else, it's not fair that two guys who spent 7 years away from WWE gets a match against each other at 'Mania.
Well its not really fair that Undertaker gets to wrestle once a year and take time away from others who work all year, but we've already gone down that road so hey, let's just say "fuck it" and leave it at that. There's no such thing as "fair" in this business, so instead let's look at what's most important...money. As I've clearly explained to you before, the money is in Rock/Brock, not Brock/Orton. Rock and Brock BOTH have crossover market appeal whereas Orton does not. Rock and Brock have history whereas there is none with Orton (from Brock's standpoint).
I see no reason or story that can make Brock/Orton compelling in the slightest while Rock/Brock basically writes itself...fuck, even their names rhyme!
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 08:38 PM
Well its not really fair that Undertaker gets to wrestle once a year and take time away from others who work all year, but we've already gone down that road so hey, let's just say "fuck it" and leave it at that. There's no such thing as "fair" in this business, so instead let's look at what's most important...money. As I've clearly explained to you before, the money is in Rock/Brock, not Brock/Orton. Rock and Brock BOTH have crossover market appeal whereas Orton does not. Rock and Brock have history whereas there is none with Orton (from Brock's standpoint).
I see no reason or story that can make Brock/Orton compelling in the slightest while Rock/Brock basically writes itself...fuck, even their names rhyme!
I don't give two shits. How do you know that more people don't feel the way I do. While Brock/Orton might not be as lucrative as Brock/Rock it is still more compelling and a better match. Dude Brock can come back as a heel and target wwe's top dog Randy Orton. It writes itself.
Death Dealer
03-31-2012, 08:41 PM
I don't give two shits. How do you know that more people don't feel the way I do. While Brock/Orton might not be as lucrative as Brock/Rock it is still more compelling and a better match. Dude Brock can come back as a heel and target wwe's top dog Randy Orton. It writes itself.
Did Cena and Punk mysteriously disappear? Orton is not the top dog.
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 08:42 PM
I don't give two shits. How do you know that more people don't feel the way I do. While Brock/Orton might not be as lucrative as Brock/Rock it is still more compelling and a better match. Dude Brock can come back as a heel and target wwe's top dog Randy Orton. It writes itself.
WWE's "top dog" is John Cena, not Randy Orton.
You're "I don't give two shits" is basically you realizing you've once again lost an argument and not being big enough to admit it. Why can't you simply understand that they will make more money with Rock/Brock and leave it at that? That's the whole reason Lesnar is back in the first place you dolt, not to job to Orton next year in perhaps the fourth match from the top of the card. He's there to make them money, and the easiest and safest way to do that is against their other "go to" guy for mainstream media attention...The Rock.
Your logic is completely baffling on every level and just because you personally want to see it doesn't mean that everyone else feels the same way you do. I have made sound arguments as to why Rock/Brock is the better match and the more economically viable one. You counter with "I don't give two shits". I wonder who people are going to listen to around here when you break it down like that?
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 08:46 PM
I told you that I agree that Rock vs Brock might make more money but Orton vs Brock will be a better story and match. And stop saying he's going to "job". Jobbing is losing in a minute with no offense. It'd be a great match and storyline. Much better than Rock/Brock
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 08:49 PM
I told you that I agree that Rock vs Brock might make more money but Orton vs Brock will be a better story and match. And stop saying he's going to "job". Jobbing is losing in a minute with no offense. It'd be a great match and storyline. Much better than Rock/Brock
Although its your opinion and you're entitled to it, I still think you are wrong. I would love for others to chime in on this and seriously sit there with a straight face and tell me that Brock/Orton would be a better story than Brock/Rock. I've already given you ample reasons why Brock/Rock would be a better story but you countered with "Brock wants to take the title of top dog away from Orton" when Orton isn't even the top dog.
Come up with something that would blow my socks off in regards to a story and I'll consider it. However for now, Brock/Rock remains the more compelling story, the more economically viable matchup and, to be honest, is probably what's going to happen IF Brock is even coming back.
After all, tomorrow is April 1st and we all know what that means...
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 08:51 PM
The only match that they've ever had was at summerslam 2002. Why would Brock want to face him again after he already beat him. Tell me that and I'll consider your point of view.
King James
03-31-2012, 09:01 PM
I hope he wrestles Batista.
That's just me.
Death Dealer
03-31-2012, 09:02 PM
I told you that I agree that Rock vs Brock might make more money but Orton vs Brock will be a better story and match. And stop saying he's going to "job". Jobbing is losing in a minute with no offense. It'd be a great match and storyline. Much better than Rock/Brock
Jobbing is just losing period you. It's called doing the job for a reason.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 09:08 PM
Jobbing is just losing period you. It's called doing the job for a reason.
No a wrestler that loses really fast is called a jobber.
Booty Tang
03-31-2012, 09:10 PM
Keep it civil.
Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using Tapatalk
Death Dealer
03-31-2012, 09:11 PM
No moron a wrestler that loses really fast is called a jobber.
The definition of a job in wrestling is to lose you retard. Fuji called no one a jobber, a jobber loses all the time. He said he was going to job which means to lose. On every card ever people job because they lose.
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 09:12 PM
The only match that they've ever had was at summerslam 2002. Why would Brock want to face him again after he already beat him. Tell me that and I'll consider your point of view.
Brock left while he was on top and accomplished as much as The Rock in a shorter amount of time. Plus when he left he went into a "real" sport and continued to be "real", even going as far as to badmouth WWE. He can say The Rock became a "phony actor", lies to the audience about still being their champion and that he wants to put him to pasture once and for all. Hell, he can even use the "I beat you once and I'll do it again Rock" line if he wants. Again, this is just off the top of my head. I'm sure if I sat down for an hour and wrote more of this I could make it infinitely more compelling than anything you can come up with for Brock/Orton.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 09:13 PM
The definition of a job in wrestling is to lose period. Fuji called no one a jobber, he said he was going to job which means to lose.
Ok sure whatever, I'm not going to get in a huge argument about the definition of jobbing.
The Viper
03-31-2012, 09:16 PM
Ok sure whatever, I'm not going to get in a huge argument about the definition of jobbing.
You called someone a moron for no reason. You're gonna expect to get into an argument. You really do write checks that your little ass can't cash.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 09:16 PM
Brock left while he was on top and accomplished as much as The Rock in a shorter amount of time. Plus when he left he went into a "real" sport and continued to be "real", even going as far as to badmouth WWE. He can say The Rock became a "phony actor", lies to the audience about still being their champion and that he wants to put him to pasture once and for all. Hell, he can even use the "I beat you once and I'll do it again Rock" line if he wants. Again, this is just off the top of my head. I'm sure if I sat down for an hour and wrote more of this I could make it infinitely more compelling than anything you can come up with for Brock/Orton.
Brock could say that he's sick of Randy acting like he's the best. Brock could say that he's still at the top of his game and he's going to prove it by taking out one of wwe's biggest stars. He's gonna prove that he's still WWE's baddest cat.
You called someone a moron for no reason. You're gonna expect to get into an argument. You really do write checks that your little ass can't cash.
Yeah because I can be the bigger man in some dumb situations. Was there really a point in you calling me out?
Booty Tang
03-31-2012, 09:18 PM
You called someone a moron for no reason. You're gonna expect to get into an argument. You really do write checks that your little ass can't cash.
No they both did, I edited the posts. Both have been pm'd drop it k?
Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using Tapatalk
Death Dealer
03-31-2012, 09:18 PM
Ok sure whatever, I'm not going to get in a huge argument about the definition of jobbing.
You'd just be wrong in your argument anyways.
The term can be used a number of ways. When a wrestler is booked, or scripted, to lose a match it is described as "a job." The act itself is described with the verb jobbing, while the act of booking (rather than being booked) to job is called jobbing out. To lose a match fairly (meaning without any kayfabe rules being broken) is to job cleanly.[2] Wrestlers who routinely lose matches are known as jobbers.
As I said it works both ways.
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 09:18 PM
Brock could say that he's sick of Randy acting like he's the best. Brock could say that he's still at the top of his game and he's going to prove it by taking out one of wwe's biggest stars. He's gonna prove that he's still WWE's baddest cat.
Do you honestly think that's more compelling than all that I wrote above? If so I feel bad for you because its clear you're feeble minded. Randy doesn't act like he's the best either, if anyone does that, its Cena and Punk. So yeah, again dude, sorry but you're argument holds no water with me.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 09:20 PM
You'd just be wrong in your argument anyways.
As I said it works both ways.
Fine so neither of us are right or wrong so let's just stop this pointless arguing.
Death Dealer
03-31-2012, 09:20 PM
I've been off topic the entire time here and I apologize for that.
On topic I'd love to see Brock/Rock II or even Brock/Cena. Hell Brock/Orton would be a good match too there's just a few more I'd rather see before it.
The Viper
03-31-2012, 09:21 PM
No they both did, I edited the posts. Both have been pm'd drop it k?
Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using Tapatalk
I ain't dropping shit until I get what I came for!!!! VIPERRKO'S BLOOD!!!!
Muahaha.
Anywho, I would love to see Rock/Brock but I guess Orton/Brock wouldn't be too bad either, but as already stated, out of the two, Rock/Brock II would make much more.money than Orton's match. Doesn't really take away that it can be a good match, though.
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 09:22 PM
I've been off topic the entire time here and I apologize for that.
On topic I'd love to see Brock/Rock II or even Brock/Cena. Hell Brock/Orton would be a good match too there's just a few more I'd rather see before it.
And again, I never said it wouldn't be good, just that there's way more reason to have Brock/Rock II and it would make more money plus have a better story. I think I've done a fairly good job proving that in my arguments but as usual ViperRKO thinks his 13 year old brain is much more logical and intelligent than mine.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 09:22 PM
Do you honestly think that's more compelling than all that I wrote above? If so I feel bad for you because its clear you're feeble minded. Randy doesn't act like he's the best either, if anyone does that, its Cena and Punk. So yeah, again dude, sorry but you're argument holds no water with me.
I'm not really excited to hear "I beat you once and I'll do it again." how does Randy not act like he's the best. There's no one more cocky than him.
And again, I never said it wouldn't be good, just that there's way more reason to have Brock/Rock II and it would make more money plus have a better story. I think I've done a fairly good job proving that in my arguments but as usual ViperRKO thinks his 13 year old brain is much more logical and intelligent than mine.
Just because I'm arguing with you doesn't mean I think I'm more intelligent with you. Shit dude when someone argues with you, they try to get their point across. It doesn't mean they think they're smarter than you.
Death Dealer
03-31-2012, 09:22 PM
Fine so neither of us are right or wrong so let's just stop this pointless arguing.
This is the last time I respond to you. You were wrong because you said losing is not jobbing and it is. I was right because I stated the fact that losing is indeed jobbing.
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 09:24 PM
I'm not really excited to hear "I beat you once and I'll do it again." how does Randy not act like he's the best. There's no one more cocky than him.
John Cena's "all I do is win" promo is more cocky than anything Randy Orton has ever done and CM Punk/Jericho BOTH refer to themselves as "Best in the World". Gee, I wonder who is cockier?
Also, you took one line out of what I wrote and tried to paint that as my entire story. You didn't bother to comment on anything else that I put in there because you goddamn well know that my idea is better than your silly one but you don't want to admit it because of some stupid sense of self-importance on your part. Grow the fuck up dude, if I honestly thought your Orton idea was better than mine at least I'd admit it.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 09:28 PM
John Cena's "all I do is win" promo is more cocky than anything Randy Orton has ever done and CM Punk/Jericho BOTH refer to themselves as "Best in the World". Gee, I wonder who is cockier?
Also, you took one line out of what I wrote and tried to paint that as my entire story. You didn't bother to comment on anything else that I put in there because you goddamn well know that my idea is better than your silly one but you don't want to admit it because of some stupid sense of self-importance on your part. Grow the fuck up dude, if I honestly thought your Orton idea was better than mine at least I'd admit it.
Ok fine. Why the fuck would Brock say that Rock left as a phony actor. That's exactly what John Cena did. And how can Brock insult Rock for leaving if he left. It doesn't matter how he left, the point is he left. And if you beat someone your not just gonna come back to beat him again. If you came back you'd want a fresh opponent, someone new that you can prove yourself against. Brock already proved that he can beat The Rock, now he wants Randy Orton.
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 09:32 PM
Ok fine. Why the fuck would Brock say that Rock left as a phony actor. That's exactly what John Cena did. And how can Brock insult Rock for leaving if he left. It doesn't matter how he left, the point is he left. And if you beat someone your not just gonna come back to beat him again. If you came back you'd want a fresh opponent, someone new that you can prove yourself against. Brock already proved that he can beat The Rock, now he wants Randy Orton.
Cena never called out The Rock on being a phony, he simply said he left and wasn't true to the fans. Hell, Brock can even dis The Rock's movies, something Cena couldn't do because his movies suck too. Brock had legitimate success as an athlete, something The Rock has never done (not even his cup of coffee in the CFL counts). And of course he could come back and want to beat someone again, especially someone he felt was worth the effort seeking out. Let's also look at this from an entirely logical perspective (something you clearly seem incapable of). IF Brock is to come back, do you really see him coming back to take on Orton? Why would he do that when the money and the marquee is with The Rock. You'd have to be an idiot to acquiesce to a match with a lower star like Orton (yes, its true) when The Rock is there.
Also, and I hate to keep harping on this but I have to because you don't explain yourself....why would Brock want to prove himself against Orton when Cena is there?
Death Dealer
03-31-2012, 09:35 PM
To be honest I'm not taking stock in any of these rumors until Brock is standing in a WWE ring again. (Not saying you all are btw)
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 09:40 PM
Cena never called out The Rock on being a phony, he simply said he left and wasn't true to the fans. Hell, Brock can even dis The Rock's movies, something Cena couldn't do because his movies suck too. Brock had legitimate success as an athlete, something The Rock has never done (not even his cup of coffee in the CFL counts). And of course he could come back and want to beat someone again, especially someone he felt was worth the effort seeking out. Let's also look at this from an entirely logical perspective (something you clearly seem incapable of). IF Brock is to come back, do you really see him coming back to take on Orton? Why would he do that when the money and the marquee is with The Rock. You'd have to be an idiot to acquiesce to a match with a lower star like Orton (yes, its true) when The Rock is there.
Also, and I hate to keep harping on this but I have to because you don't explain yourself....why would Brock want to prove himself against Orton when Cena is there?
So now your turning this into what Brock will come back for. Yeah I'm sure Brock will feud with Rock. This conversation is what will be a better storyline. And he could go after Cena or Orton. Orton more because he's more of a badass than Cena. Cena is just the happy go-lucky babyface. Randy is a badass who hurts people. Those are the kind of people Brock likes to face. That's what I'm getting at. I'm sure you will get your way but I prefer mine.
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 09:44 PM
So now your turning this into what Brock will come back for. Yeah I'm sure Brock will feud with Rock. This conversation is what will be a better storyline. And he could go after Cena or Orton. Orton more because he's more of a badass than Cena. Cena is just the happy go-lucky babyface. Randy is a badass who hurts people. Those are the kind of people Brock likes to face. That's what I'm getting at. I'm sure you will get your way but I prefer mine.
When did I turn things into anything other than explaining why Brock vs. Rock is a more compelling story? And :lol: at who Brock "likes" to face, it doesn't have anything to do with that. It's a business designed to make the most money possible and to do that you do Brock/Rock, NOT Brock/Orton.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 09:49 PM
When did I turn things into anything other than explaining why Brock vs. Rock is a more compelling story? And :lol: at who Brock "likes" to face, it doesn't have anything to do with that. It's a business designed to make the most money possible and to do that you do Brock/Rock, NOT Brock/Orton.
Yeah you turned this into what Brock will do for the money. It's not about what he will do it's about what will be the better story. Like I said I'm sure Brock will face Rock but I prefer Orton
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 10:00 PM
Yeah you turned this into what Brock will do for the money. It's not about what he will do it's about what will be the better story. Like I said I'm sure Brock will face Rock but I prefer Orton
I already told you multiple times why Brock/Rock is the better story and you never once countered it properly. All you did was continually babble on about Orton being the top dog, which again, doesn't even make sense.
However, I have decided to be the bigger person here because I am tired of debating this with a brick wall so......
Oh my goodness ViperRKO, you are so intelligent I can't believe I didn't think of Brock wanting to beat Orton because Orton is such a bad ass that its the only way Brock can show how cool and hip he is. I'm sure he'll do something like argue that he was the Apex Predator of WWE before Orton was and possibly even make reference to the fact that IF he'd stuck around Orton would be nothing more than fodder in the mid card. Hell, he could even go on about how he had tattoos before Orton did, maybe even argue that he was a much bigger star in his short time in WWE than Orton ever will be even though he's a "lifer".
I love you ViperRKO...you are so smart and I am so dumb. Goodnight.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 10:05 PM
I already told you multiple times why Brock/Rock is the better story and you never once countered it properly. All you did was continually babble on about Orton being the top dog, which again, doesn't even make sense.
However, I have decided to be the bigger person here because I am tired of debating this with a brick wall so......
Oh my goodness ViperRKO, you are so intelligent I can't believe I didn't think of Brock wanting to beat Orton because Orton is such a bad ass that its the only way Brock can show how cool and hip he is. I'm sure he'll do something like argue that he was the Apex Predator of WWE before Orton was and possibly even make reference to the fact that IF he'd stuck around Orton would be nothing more than fodder in the mid card. Hell, he could even go on about how he had tattoos before Orton did, maybe even argue that he was a much bigger star in his short time in WWE than Orton ever will be even though he's a "lifer".
I love you ViperRKO...you are so smart and I am so dumb. Goodnight.
Wow apparently you didn't read a word I said or misinterpreted it. I can see you're ticked off so goodnight to you too. (spits)
King James
03-31-2012, 10:10 PM
Well since everyone ignored my Batista joke.
I'd personally love for Brock to face Triple H. At this stage, Triple H doesn't need to rely on technical prowess, he can get by sheerly on his brawling and no one will hate him for it at this stage in his career. Since he doesn't have anything to prove in the psychology department, I think a huge Triple H vs. Brock full on brawl would be the shit. There would be an insane amount of high impact moves and I think the match in general would be one big hard hitting showdown, and could very well go for over 30 minutes. I think HHH could have a true classic with Lesnar, and the only other person I think would have as much chemistry with Brock is Cena, but I'd rather Cena face someone from the main roster, rather than yet another special attraction, so to me, no one fits the bill better than The King of Kings.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 10:14 PM
Well since everyone ignored my Batista joke.
I'd personally love for Brock to face Triple H. At this stage, Triple H doesn't need to rely on technical prowess, he can get by sheerly on his brawling and no one will hate him for it at this stage in his career. Since he doesn't have anything to prove in the psychology department, I think a huge Triple H vs. Brock full on brawl would be the shit. There would be an insane amount of high impact moves and I think the match in general would be one big hard hitting showdown, and could very well go for over 30 minutes. I think HHH could have a true classic with Lesnar, and the only other person I think would have as much chemistry with Brock is Cena, but I'd rather Cena face someone from the main roster, rather than yet another special attraction, so to me, no one fits the bill better than The King of Kings.
And the storyline is...
Citan
03-31-2012, 10:15 PM
I hope he wrestles Batista.
That's just me.
"Brock, YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BE MY FRIEND!"
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 10:18 PM
Coincidentally Batista has arrived in Miami as well and was picked up by WWE personel. So look for him to appear at WrestleMania tomorrow too.
Citan
03-31-2012, 10:19 PM
That would be nice if he came back as a heel. He was a lot of fun as a heel. As a face, not so much.
The Viper
03-31-2012, 10:19 PM
Coincidentally Batista has arrived in Miami as well and was picked up by WWE personel. So look for him to appear at WrestleMania tomorrow too.
Douche bag haircut, nose ring and all.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 10:21 PM
Douche bag haircut, nose ring and all.
Yeah apparently Batista thinks he's gangsta now.
Fuji Vice
03-31-2012, 10:22 PM
I am going to lulz so fucking hard if this all turns out to be some sort of elaborate April Fool's prank and Brock/Batista aren't even there.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 10:24 PM
Don't expect Batista to be there. It's Brock that's in serious negations. And how would we know if it's april fools day prank. If he doesn't show up it could just be for the reason that him and wwe couldn't come to an agreement.
King James
03-31-2012, 10:26 PM
And the storyline is...
Could be any number of things. Maybe Brock comes on Monday and is just there for a little bit of publicity, and arrogantly, Triple H comes out and says that he never got a thank you for letting him appear, and Brock could come back and say that Triple H never thanked him for leaving the WWE and letting him have all the world title reigns that he wouldn't have had if he was around. Then, feeling challenged, Triple H gets pissed and assures Lesnar that if he had stuck around, he would have kicked his ass and won just as many titles. And then of course Lesnar wants Triple H to prove it... at Mania of course.
Or, Lesnar could play to Triple H being the owner of Mania and be the heel in the scenario, and joke about how he owns a fake wrestling company. Lesnar talks about leaving to find some real competition, and then to protect the good name of wrestling, Triple H challenges Lesnar to a match, no holds barred, and they make it seem like a legit battle, not just a pro wrestling match.
Since Triple H basically runs the number one 'fake' wrestling promotion in the world and Lesnar fancies himself to be a 'real' wrestler, there are a lot of ways to go with it. Maybe HHH even feels like Lesnar got his ass kicked in MMA so many times he had to tuck tail and run back to WWE, but even in WWE he's gonna get his ass kicked (even though in reality, Lesnar didn't get his ass kicked too many times. Only 3... but still..)
There are a lot of ways to build it, imo. And don't start an argument please. If you don't support the match, that's fine, but we don't need any more conflict in this thread than what there aready is.
King James
03-31-2012, 10:28 PM
Also, Batista IS there, but I don't really think he'll be involved in any capacity. Prolly just watch the show, make a little cameo appearance as part of the crowd or something. But he's definitely in Miami, that's believable.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 10:33 PM
No there not just going to say "oh look former world champion Batista is in attendance" and then have him wave to the camera. Just no
King James
03-31-2012, 10:37 PM
They might say "Former WWE world champion and MMA star, Batista" though.
Maybe.
But he'll be there. Somewhere.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 10:39 PM
They might say "Former WWE world champion and MMA star, Batista" though.
Maybe.
But he'll be there. Somewhere.
Somewhere in the dark waiting for his chance...
Death Dealer
03-31-2012, 10:40 PM
Hell maybe Tista just wanted to watch the Horsemen's induction.
The Viper
03-31-2012, 10:43 PM
I am going to lulz so fucking hard if this all turns out to be some sort of elaborate April Fool's prank and Brock/Batista aren't even there.
Yeah that's what I'm afraid of. You never know with these dirt sheets.
King James
03-31-2012, 10:44 PM
Flair was his mentor, so that's a fair assumption. They'll at least mention his role in mentoring Batista, and they might get a shot of him clapping. It's hard to tell, tbh.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 10:44 PM
Yeah that's what I'm afraid of. You never know with these dirt sheets.
No come on they wouldn't... I think
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 10:46 PM
Flair was his mentor, so that's a fair assumption. They'll at least mention his role in mentoring Batista, and they might get a shot of him clapping. It's hard to tell, tbh.
- The Four Horsemen are up next as Dusty Rhodes makes his way out to do the induction. Dusty talks about how unique the Horsemen were and calls Ric Flair a national treasure. Dusty talks about Flair with a lot of passion.
*
Dusty goes on to talk about his famous feuds with the Horsemen and calls Arn Anderson the Horsemen’s heartbeat. Dusty puts over the others before introducing The Four Horsemen to a nice ovation.
*
A big “Thank You Horsemen” chant breaks out and it’s amazing. Flair gets chants to come back and he says “I want to…” Flair gets emotional as he talks about his career and what the Horsemen were.
*
Tully Blanchard is stylin’ but talks about his father who passed away recently. It changes the look on the others faces. Arn Anderson is up next and our correspondent reports that he gets the biggest pop of anyone so far out of all the inductions. Arn also gives one of the bet speeches so far of the night and puts over JJ Dillon, Bobby Heenan and Paul Ellering as managers.
*
Arn also puts over CM Punk. The rumors of Arn being a big CM Punk fan are true. He gives high marks to Randy Orton, Big Show, Rey Mysterio and John Cena. Cena’s name looks to get boo’d but Arn calls Cena the best human being that he knows and the crowd approves.
Credit to pwmania.com
Booty Tang
03-31-2012, 10:47 PM
Brock v Taker is the money maker...esp with their personal beef
Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using Tapatalk
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 10:49 PM
Brock v Taker is the money maker...esp with their personal beef
Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using Tapatalk
That's a dream match that a lot of people want to see
King James
03-31-2012, 10:49 PM
Professor Booty - true that
ViperRKO - I'm talking about the victory lap they traditionally do during WrestleMania where they honor them once more, but they don't give speeches.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 10:52 PM
Professor Booty - true that
ViperRKO - I'm talking about the victory lap they traditionally do during WrestleMania where they honor them once more, but they don't give speeches.
Sorry but they're not going to just show Dave clapping for Ric and the Horsemen.
Death Dealer
03-31-2012, 10:53 PM
You don't know that so stop acting like you do.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 10:55 PM
You don't know that so stop acting like you do.
Do you know that they will do that?
Death Dealer
03-31-2012, 10:57 PM
Do you know that they will do that?
I didn't say they would but to simply deny it is stupid. Because they very well COULD do that.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 11:00 PM
I didn't say they would but to simply deny it is stupid. Because they very well COULD do that.
Can you use some fucking logic. They're not going to take a huge superstar like Batista and just show him on camera for a second. It'd be stupid.
Death Dealer
03-31-2012, 11:03 PM
If he's not under contract and he's just there to see his mentor get inducted again why wouldn't they show him clapping? It's no big deal. And you telling me to use logic when you never do is hilarious.
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 11:06 PM
If he's not under contract and he's just there to see his mentor get inducted again why wouldn't they show him clapping? It's no big deal. And you telling me to use logic when you never do is hilarious.
Me saying he's not going to be shown clapping is using logic.
Death Dealer
03-31-2012, 11:08 PM
If he there in attendance showing respect for his mentor and he has no intention of wrestling again why wouldn't they show him? Answer me that. Would it make the company look bad that a former star was paying respect to a legend? No. Does no harm. So again, why wouldn't they?
Booty Tang
03-31-2012, 11:11 PM
I am about to lock this thread. They show former stars all the time.
Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using Tapatalk
Sabretooth
03-31-2012, 11:11 PM
If he there in attendance showing respect for his mentor and he has no intention of wrestling again why wouldn't they show him? Answer me that. Would it make the company look bad that a former star was paying respect to a legend? No. Does no harm. So again, why wouldn't they?
Because it'd look stupid to have a huge star like Dave who just randomly left shown clapping for a second.
Booty Tang
03-31-2012, 11:16 PM
He left on good terms. They showed Waltman last year. Your argument makes no sense. So let's drop it yo.
Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using Tapatalk
W-olf
04-01-2012, 10:30 AM
EWN
Source: The Wrestling Observer
As we have been noted since yesterday, Brock Lesnar has been negotiating with WWE for a surprise return at Sunday's WrestleMania 28 event. It has been noted that both sides have been in talks for a month and that WWE at least initially wanted his return match to take place at SummerSlam on August 19. The Rock is aware of Lesnar's negotiations, which is why he refused to say anything to a reporter earlier in the week when questioned about Brock.
Also, Lesnar has arrived in Miami. He arrived with security and a large group of people shielding him from everyone. While not confirmed, the story making the rounds is that he has signed a one-year deal with WWE and will work a schedule more than the Undertaker would work, but less than Goldberg worked for the company.
Fuji Vice
04-01-2012, 10:48 AM
Merged these two threads together and changed the title along with adding this piece of news...
F4WOnline.com reports that Brock Lesnar has signed a one year deal with WWE. This would presumably allow him to appear at WrestleMania 28 tonight. As reported earlier, Lesnar is in Miami.
W-olf
04-01-2012, 10:49 AM
Still not confirmed but its probably true have to wait and see on this one .
I wouldn't mind seeing Brock back in some capacity tonight.
W-olf
04-01-2012, 01:08 PM
Batista just confirmed he's in Miami too .
Sabretooth
04-01-2012, 01:10 PM
Batista just confirmed he's in Miami too .
Cool I hope he rapes somebody.
Death Dealer
04-01-2012, 01:16 PM
I hop Big Dave comes out before Rock/Cena makes fun of Cena for kissing babies and hugging fat girls.
Sabretooth
04-01-2012, 01:17 PM
If Batista cuts a heel promo about Cena spending all his time with make a wish and kissing up to the audience then I'll mark out.
W-olf
04-01-2012, 01:29 PM
Possibly a heel promo but I would never think WWE would write in that any one mention the Make A Wish foundation ( Which I am a HUGE Supporter of ).
Sabretooth
04-01-2012, 01:30 PM
Possibly a heel promo but I would never think WWE would write in that any one mention the Make A Wish foundation ( Which I am a HUGE Supporter of ).
Yeah I know I was joking. That's obviously not gonna happen. Just a thought
W-olf
04-01-2012, 01:37 PM
Still though I wouldn't mind seeing him though does anyone know if he gained any of his muscle mass back ?
King James
04-01-2012, 05:22 PM
I dunno. He looked like pretty bad last I saw him, compared to his original look.
Anyways, I hope Brock rocks his fucking awesome caveman beard in the WWE.. It's an awesome heel look.
Sabretooth
04-01-2012, 05:24 PM
Brock looked like shit. He has no muscle anymore. He's just thick now
Booty Tang
04-01-2012, 05:24 PM
if he does you are gonna be looking at a schedule along the lines of what Taker did a few years back....his health is still an issue I mean he had so much of his intestine taken out he can't be 100%
Sabretooth
04-01-2012, 05:29 PM
The rumor is that his schedule will be "more than undertaker less than Goldberg"
King James
04-01-2012, 05:36 PM
Brock doesn't look like shit..? He's got a fucking solid build. Any man would be proud to look like Brock does, he's a man beast. I think he looks more threatening now than he did in his first tenure with the WWE, because he was all clean cut and shredded, now he's just rough and gruff looking.
http://cdn2.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/2583975/137_Brock_Lesnar_and_Alistair_Overeem_large.jpg
that's a killer physique. Add in the beard and he's 110 proof badass.
http://a323.yahoofs.com/ymg/ept_sports_mma_experts__24/ept_sports_mma_experts-739225621-1287625734.jpg?ymGAT9DDaaEDa2nE
That's what I call menacing.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.3 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.